<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Choral-Singing on Lloyd W. Hanson</title>
    <link>https://www.lloydwhanson.com/categories/choral-singing/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Choral-Singing on Lloyd W. Hanson</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 19:31:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.lloydwhanson.com/categories/choral-singing/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Soprano Voice in Choral Music</title>
      <link>https://www.lloydwhanson.com/uncategorized/the-soprano-voice-in-choral-music-3/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 19:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
       <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.lloydwhanson.com/uncategorized/the-soprano-voice-in-choral-music-3/</guid> 
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Soprano Voice in Choral Music&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The soprano voice can easily overcome any choral sound especially if it has a basically flute quality. Consider the orchestra; 2 or 3 flutes against 30 to 45 strings. That has become the accepted balance of sounds yet the flute does not produce a tone louder than a violin. Why are so few flutes needed to be heard easily against a literal army of strings?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
